Decentralization of education: why, when, what and how?; Fundamentals of educational planning; Vol.:64; 1999

Cooperation Agency (Sida) has provided financial assistance for the publication of this bookle The Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida) has provided financial assistance for the publication of this booklet.i 54. Functional analysis (management audits) of the organization of ministries of education, R. Sack and M. Saïdi 55. Reducing repetition: issues and strategies, Thomas Owen Eisemon 56. Increasing girls and women's participation in basic education, Nelly P. Stromquist 57. Physical facilities for education: what planners need to know, John Beynon 58. Planning learner-centred adult literacy programmes, Susan E. Malone and Robert F. Arnove 59. Training teachers to work in schools considered difficult, Jean-Louis Auduc 60. Evaluating higher education, Jeanne Lamoure Rontopoulou 61. The shadow education system: private tutoring and its implications for planners, Mark Bray 62. School-based management, Ibtisam Abu-Duhou 63. Globalization and educational reform: what planners need to know, Martin Carnoy * Also published in French. Other titles to appear. The Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida) has provided financial assistance for the publication of this booklet. The booklets in this series are written primarily for two types of clientele: those engaged in educational planning and administration, in developing as well as developed countries; and others, less specialized, such as senior government officials and policy-makers who seek a more general understanding of educational planning and of how it is related to overall national development. They are intended to be of use either for private study or in formal training programmes. Since this series was launched in 1967 practices and concepts of educational planning have undergone substantial change. Many of the assumptions which underlay earlier attempts to rationalize the process of educational development have been criticized or abandoned. Even if rigid mandatory centralized planning has now clearly proven to be inappropriate, this does not mean that all forms of planning have been dispensed with. On the contrary, the need for collecting data, evaluating the efficiency of existing programmes, undertaking a wide range of studies, exploring the future and fostering broad debate on these bases to guide educational policy and decision-making has become even more acute than before. The scope of educational planning has been broadened. In addition to the formal system of education, it is now applied to all other important educational efforts in non-formal settings. Attention to the growth and expansion of education systems is being complemented and sometimes even replaced by a growing concern for the quality of …